For Christmas I received an intriguing gift from a pal - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a couple of easy prompts about me supplied by my pal Janet.

It's an intriguing read, qoocle.com and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of writing, but it's also a bit repeated, and very verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's prompts in collating information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, considering that rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, wiki-tb-service.com can purchase any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody creating one in anyone's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, created by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is planned as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He hopes to broaden his variety, producing different categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human clients.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, systemcheck-wiki.de authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we really mean human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for creative functions ought to be prohibited, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without consent ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective but let's build it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually chosen to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to use developers' material on the web to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also highly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of delight," states the Baroness, wiki.myamens.com who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its best carrying out industries on the unclear promise of growth."

A federal government representative said: "No move will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a practical strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for best holders to help them accredit their material, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a nationwide data library including public data from a vast array of sources will also be made offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share information of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to want the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a number of claims versus AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute fair use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it need to be paying for menwiki.men it.

If this wasn't all adequate to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the many downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a portion of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite challenging to read in parts because it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm unsure the length of time I can stay positive that my considerably slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.